2002 2003 2004 <2005> 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 2002 2003 2004 <2005> 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | Re: V4 design issue: Should primitive data types have well defined precisions? |
From: | Ralph Lange <[email protected]> |
To: | Kay-Uwe Kasemir <[email protected]> |
Cc: | EPICS Core Talk <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:28:47 +0200 |
Kay-Uwe Kasemir wrote:
Bottom line: the supported well-known primitive data types and the types that a certain implementation of dataAccess implements in its interface functions are two pairs of things.Hi Ralph! two pairs = 4 things ?
Oops, I'm sorry. Of course: Times the number of participating developers. 36 things? 40 things? Ralph