2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 <2010> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 <2010> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | Re: naming the operating system independence layer |
From: | Ralph Lange <[email protected]> |
To: | [email protected] |
Date: | Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:46:05 -0400 |
Agreed. I was just asking... Ralph On Thu 01 Apr 2010 19:13:54 Andrew Johnson wrote:
On Thursday 01 April 2010 15:16:34 Jeff Hill wrote:Would a second-level tag "com" (or "libcom"?) make sense for all libcom stuff, and then maybe "osi" below that?I suppose the rationale against including packaging boundaries in the namespace hierarchy would be that you couldn’t change the packaging without impacting the source code of users. Is there a benefit resulting from including packaging boundaries in the namespace hierarchy?Not that I can think of, I vote we just use epics::osi - Andrew