| 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 <2012> 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 <2012> 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
| <== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
|---|
| Subject: | Re: New RTOS cross with linux+RT_PREEMPT patch |
| From: | "Ernest L. Williams Jr." <[email protected]> |
| To: | Andrew Johnson <[email protected]> |
| Cc: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 May 2012 10:41:59 -0700 |
On 05/15/2012 09:09 AM, Andrew Johnson wrote:
Hi Ernest, On 2012-05-15 Ernest L. Williams Jr. wrote:Here at SLAC we are working with a new RTOS (soft real-time) As the development continues forward, I hope it approaches hard-real time.RTLinux is a commercial product from Wind River, is that what you're using? If not you should pick a different target name. I'm aware that there is an Open RTLinux license available for academic, research and free software projects, but that's using the same code as the commercial product.
We are not using the product from WRS. So, we will propose a different name. How about "linuxRT-x86" and "linuxRT-ppcP2020" ?
We are proposing the following name in<BASE>/configure/os CONFIG.Common.rtlinux-x86 CONFIG_SITE.Common.rtlinux-x86 The above is support Intel-based targets. Another target we have is a freescale P2020 CONFIG.Common.rtlinux-ppcP2020 CONFIG_SITE.Common.rtlinux-ppcP2020Will these targets be using the standard Linux OS_CLASS or do they require their own versions of the OS-dependent files under src/libCom/osi/os?
We are using the standard Linux "OS_CLASS" Cheers, Ernest
- Andrew