Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
On 07/06/2015 02:23 PM, Michael Davidsaver wrote:
> FYI, it seems that as of gcc 4.8 there is a new warning which is
> triggered by STATIC_ASSERT in Base.
>
> This warning means that the assertion is *not* being violated.
I see that in 3.15 we already include the EPICS_UNUSED attribute in that
macro, does it help to move it immediately after the 'int'?
- Andrew
--
Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong.
No matter how fast light travels, it finds the darkness has
always got there first, and is waiting for it.
-- Terry Pratchett, Reaper Man
- Replies:
- Re: STATIC_ASSERT and -Wunused-local-typedefs Johnson, Andrew N.
- References:
- STATIC_ASSERT and -Wunused-local-typedefs Michael Davidsaver
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
STATIC_ASSERT and -Wunused-local-typedefs Michael Davidsaver
- Next:
Re: STATIC_ASSERT and -Wunused-local-typedefs Johnson, Andrew N.
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
<2015>
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
STATIC_ASSERT and -Wunused-local-typedefs Michael Davidsaver
- Next:
Re: STATIC_ASSERT and -Wunused-local-typedefs Johnson, Andrew N.
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
<2015>
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025