On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 at 16:13, Benjamin Franksen via Core-talk <
[email protected]> wrote:
Am 19.11.18 um 18:29 schrieb Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk:
> The CA protocol's channel name length is not limited by the size of the
> NAME field in the IOC.
I am aware of that. Sorry for not expressing myself clearly.
> Ben, what limitations are you trying to solve, and how do you know that
> they actually exist?
Basically, the limit of 40 bytes on the DBR_STRING data type. Which in
turn implies a limit on the length of things you can put into link
field.
I don't quite understand.
Link fields have much wider limits: pushed to 128 then 256 chars in 3.15; unlimited in 7.0
Setting those fields through CA is possible using the "long string" mode, i.e. by writing an array of char to the PV which gets a "$" suffix.