| 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 <2019> 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 | Index | 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 <2019> 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
| <== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Merge] ~anj/epics-base/+git/base-7.0:fix-1824277 into epics-base:7.0 |
| From: | mdavidsaver via Core-talk <[email protected]> |
| To: | Andrew Johnson <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Mon, 22 Apr 2019 20:53:21 -0000 |
I'd like to see some test coverage for the more common case of writing to eg. '.A', both when INPA="" and when INPA="5" (or other non-empty). Does this change effect all link fields now? (eg. INP for aiRecord) Also, have you ever seen external record support special() looking for PV_LINK? It looks to me like such cases would instead see DB_LINK or CA_LINK. My only objection is to rushing it out. lp:1824277 does not seem to effect many users. Let's not break something which does. Maybe we merge this just after 7.0.2.2? -- https://code.launchpad.net/~anj/epics-base/+git/base-7.0/+merge/366247 Your team EPICS Core Developers is requested to review the proposed merge of ~anj/epics-base/+git/base-7.0:fix-1824277 into epics-base:7.0.