Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
Hi Mark,
> However, the really good news is that when I build with the 3.3.2
> dynamic version of libfftw3f.so the new build is actually ~20%
> faster than the old static build. So now I am happy, I have gained
> performance rather than lost performance when rebuilding.
Good to hear. If performance matters try building FFTW with
-O3 -march=native -mtune=native -mavx (Sandy Bridge and higher) -mavx2
(Haswell and higher)
You might need to configure FFTW with --enable-avx2. Sounds like you
have a state-of-the-art CPU and with FFTW >=3.3 you might actually be
able to leverage some of its features. BTW: FFTW 3.3.2 is more than 8
years old - there's a good chance newer versions will perform better on
modern hardware.
-Martin
--
Martin Konrad
Facility for Rare Isotope Beams
Michigan State University
640 South Shaw Lane
East Lansing, MI 48824-1321, USA
Tel. 517-908-7253
Email: konrad at frib.msu.edu
- References:
- EPICS shared library performance Mark Rivers via Core-talk
- Re: EPICS shared library performance Konrad, Martin via Core-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: EPICS shared library performance Mark Rivers via Core-talk
- Next:
Re: [Merge] ~dirk.zimoch/epics-base:fix_zero_size_arrays into epics-base:7.0 Dirk Zimoch via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
<2020>
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: EPICS shared library performance Mark Rivers via Core-talk
- Next:
Re: EPICS shared library performance Konrad, Martin via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
<2020>
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025