| 2002 2003 2004 <2005> 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 | Index | 2002 2003 2004 <2005> 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
| <== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
|---|
| Subject: | Re: V4 DB RecordCommon: Suggestion for alarmAckTransient (ACKT replacement) |
| From: | Marty Kraimer <[email protected]> |
| To: | EPICS Core Talk <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Oct 2005 07:34:43 -0500 |
Ralph Lange wrote:
Maybe change the name? alarmAckTransient -> alarmNoAckTransientLevel Would that be more comprehensive? Or do you have a better idea?
No. I will make it alarmNoAckTransientLevel unless someone has a better idea.
Marty
Ralph Marty Kraimer wrote:Ralph Lange wrote:Suggestion:Change the type of alarmAckTransient from boolean to menu(menuAlarmSevr) and redefine it as "highest level of alarm that does not have to be acknowledged". Doesn't need more space in the DB and allows for nice and subtle configuration options: e.g. warnings that don't have to be ack'ed while errors do.What do you think?Sounds fine to me. I will change RecordCommon.wiki to field(alarmAckTransient,menu(menuAlarmSevr)) { # highest level of alarm that does not have to be acknowledged" } If there are objections it can always be changed back. Marty