Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
|
Subject: |
Re: string to binary conversion in the db |
|
From: |
[email protected] (William Lupton) |
|
Date: |
Thu, 9 Feb 95 09:25:27 HST |
Jeff writes:
> Currently if CA sends a string to a binary database field we
> check in record support for an explicit match with the name of
> one of the states. If this fails shouldnt we also match for "0","1",
> ... matching a valid state so that it is easier to write (and
> use) ascii based tools?
That seems like a good idea ... has anyone considered permitting abbreviation
to significant length of supplied string too, possibly useful when using text
entry for such a field? ... or case-independence?
William
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
string to binary conversion in the db Jeff Hill
- Next:
Observations on EPICS Alpha port & DEC support of VxWorks 415
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
string to binary conversion in the db Jeff Hill
- Next:
Re: string to binary conversion in the db Tim Mooney
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024