Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
I am finding poor response times for the portable CA server. Doing a 'get'
for a PV on an IOC gives a typical response time of about 3 msec, rising to
about 10 msec max. Doing a 'get' for a PV on a workstation running the
'excas' example PV server gives a typical response time of about 100 msec,
rising to 600 msec max. I get the same behavior under Solaris and under
Linux, neither workstation is heavily loaded.
Can anyone explain the difference, and is there anything I can do to improve
the performance?
Epics versions R3.13.1, R3.13.2
Workstation(s) Sparc 20 w/ Solaris & 450 MHz PII w/ Red Hat Linux 6.2
- Replies:
- RE: Performance of portable CA server ? Jeff Hill
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
memory leak - 7/10/00 cpu used is 74.7% normally 61-62% luchini
- Next:
RE: Performance of portable CA server ? Jeff Hill
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
<2000>
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: memory leak - 7/10/00 cpu used is 74.7% normally 61-62% Allison, Stephanie
- Next:
RE: Performance of portable CA server ? Jeff Hill
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
<2000>
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024