EPICS Home

Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System


 
1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <20002001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <20002001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Performance of portable CA server ?
From: jennings <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 16:30:46 -0500
I am finding poor response times for the portable CA server.  Doing a 'get'
for a PV on an IOC gives a typical response time of about 3 msec, rising to
about 10 msec max.  Doing a 'get' for a PV on a workstation running the
'excas' example PV server gives a typical response time of about 100 msec,
rising to 600 msec max.  I get the same behavior under Solaris and under
Linux, neither workstation is heavily loaded.

Can anyone explain the difference, and is there anything I can do to improve
the performance?

Epics versions R3.13.1, R3.13.2
Workstation(s) Sparc 20 w/ Solaris & 450 MHz PII w/ Red Hat Linux 6.2



Replies:
RE: Performance of portable CA server ? Jeff Hill

Navigate by Date:
Prev: memory leak - 7/10/00 cpu used is 74.7% normally 61-62% luchini
Next: RE: Performance of portable CA server ? Jeff Hill
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <20002001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: RE: memory leak - 7/10/00 cpu used is 74.7% normally 61-62% Allison, Stephanie
Next: RE: Performance of portable CA server ? Jeff Hill
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <20002001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024