| 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 <2011> 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 <2011> 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
| <== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
|---|
| Subject: | RE: Asub record problems to update waveforms of string-type |
| From: | "Steiner, Mathias" <[email protected]> |
| To: | "Allison, Stephanie" <[email protected]>, Perrier Pierre <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:14:57 +0000 |
Stephanie wrote: >> Would setting "PP" in the OUTA field do the same thing? That would free up the FLNK for future use. I don't think so; that's what I tried first and it did not work. Mind you, I'm not claiming to understand the behavior. Here's something I wrote down at the EPICS training at BLN: 'Bob [Dalesio] went into a lot of details about the way data are sent around the network. One thing that stuck out was a remark about how record data are queued in network packets: "... waveform records are the exception. Their values are not queued, but the p ointers are." To which I asked: "Is that why my waveform records often do not update properly in EDM when they are changed by a subroutine record?" Answer: Yes.' Cheers -Mathias