1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 <2023> 2024 2025 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 <2023> 2024 2025 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | Re: USB permissions |
From: | "Guruswamy, Tejas via Tech-talk" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> |
To: | "tech-talk at aps.anl.gov" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> |
Date: | Tue, 26 Sep 2023 17:57:44 +0000 |
In general, the modern Linux / systemd config standard is to read distro-installed files from /usr and user-installed files from /etc. This is so that an update of a distro package does not overwrite user modifications, and enable root-fs-read-only systems
with an /etc config overlay.
On a normal filesystem layout it won't break if you don't stick to that convention, just know that both locations are valid, and /etc is given priority.
Regards,
Tejas
APS, XSD-DET
Argonne National Laboratory
From: Tech-talk <tech-talk-bounces at aps.anl.gov> on behalf of Mark Rivers via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 11:35 AM To: Jörn Dreyer <j.dreyer at hzdr.de>; tech-talk at aps.anl.gov <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> Subject: RE: USB permissions Hi Jörn,
Thanks, indeed all of the udev rules files on my Centos 9 systems are in /usr/lib/udev/rules.d, not in /etc/udev/rules.d. The file that changes the permissions for the Measurement Computing devices is 50-uldaq.rules. It is present in /usr/lib/udev/rules.d on all of the systems that I use with Measurement Computing devices. It gets installed when one builds their uldaq library from source. Thanks, Mark -----Original Message----- From: Jörn Dreyer <j.dreyer at hzdr.de> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2023 10:47 PM To: tech-talk at aps.anl.gov Cc: Mark Rivers <rivers at cars.uchicago.edu> Subject: Re: USB permissions Hi Mark, on some systems, especially those with systemd, there is another directory where udev looks for rules files. Did you check in /usr/lib/udev/rules.d for a file that might set the permissions for those devices? Regards Jörn Am Montag, 25. September 2023, 23:52:10 CEST schrieb Mark Rivers via Tech- talk: > Folks, > > I am seeing something I don't understand about USB device permissions > on Linux. I have two Centos 9 systems, each connected to 3 USB > devices from Measurement Computing. > > On the system called 13ide I needed to install a udev rules file in > order to give these USB devices world write permission. > > This is part of the rules file: > > (base) [epics@13ide ~]$ more /etc/udev/rules.d/50-uldaq.rules > SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ATTR{idVendor}=="09db", ATTR{idProduct}=="0076", > GROUP="adm", MODE="0666" SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ATTR{idVendor}=="09db", > ATTR{idProduct}=="007f", GROUP="adm", MODE="0666" SUBSYSTEM=="usb", > ATTR{idVendor}=="09db", ATTR{idProduct}=="0085", GROUP="adm", MODE="0666" > SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ATTR{idVendor}=="09db", ATTR{idProduct}=="0086", > GROUP="adm", MODE="0666" SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ATTR{idVendor}=="09db", > ATTR{idProduct}=="008a", GROUP="adm", MODE="0666" > > lsusb shows that the devices are on bus 002, devices 005, 007, and 008. > > (base) [epics@13ide ~]$ lsusb > Bus 002 Device 009: ID 0557:2259 ATEN International Co., Ltd LCD > Console > V1.3.124 Bus 002 Device 006: ID 0557:2259 ATEN International Co., Ltd > LCD Console V1.3.124 Bus 002 Device 004: ID 0557:8021 ATEN > International Co., Ltd Hub Bus 002 Device 008: ID 09db:013e > Measurement Computing Corp. USB-1808X Bus 002 Device 007: ID 09db:009d > Measurement Computing Corp. USB-3104 Bus 002 Device 005: ID 09db:0127 > Measurement Computing Corp. USB-CTR08 > > This shows that those devices have permission 666 and are owned by the "adm" > group. > > (base) [epics@13ide ~]$ ls -l /dev/bus/usb/002 total 0 > crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 189, 128 Sep 19 11:45 001 > crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 189, 129 Sep 19 11:45 002 > crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 189, 130 Sep 19 11:45 003 > crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 189, 131 Sep 19 11:45 004 > crw-rw-rw- 1 root adm 189, 132 Sep 19 11:45 005 > crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 189, 133 Sep 19 11:45 006 > crw-rw-rw- 1 root adm 189, 134 Sep 19 11:45 007 > crw-rw-rw- 1 root adm 189, 135 Sep 19 11:45 008 > crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 189, 136 Sep 19 11:45 009 > > This makes sense to me because permission 666 and group "adm" are in > the 50-uldaq.rules file. > > However, I have another system which does not have a udev rules file > in that location. > > [epics@13idc ~]$ ls -l /etc/udev/rules.d/ total 0 > > On that system the devices are on bus 001, devices 004, 005, and 006. > > [epics@13idc udev]$ lsusb > Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub Bus 001 > Device 010: ID 1604:10c0 Tascam Dell Integrated Hub Bus 001 Device > 009: ID 413c:a102 Dell Computer Corp. iDRAC Virtual NIC Bus 001 Device > 007: ID 1604:10c0 Tascam Dell Integrated Hub Bus 001 Device 003: ID > 1604:10c0 Tascam Dell Integrated Hub Bus 001 Device 006: ID 09db:013e > Measurement Computing Corp. USB-1808X Bus 001 Device 005: ID 09db:009d > Measurement Computing Corp. USB-3104 Bus 001 Device 004: ID 09db:0127 > Measurement Computing Corp. USB-CTR08 Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0409:005a > NEC Corp. HighSpeed Hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux > Foundation 2.0 root hub > > The following shows that these devices also have permissions 666 and > are in the "adm" group. > > [epics@13idc udev]$ ls -l /dev/bus/usb/001 total 0 > crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 189, 0 Sep 19 12:09 001 > crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 189, 1 Sep 19 12:09 002 > crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 189, 2 Sep 19 12:09 003 > crw-rw-rw- 1 root adm 189, 3 Sep 19 12:09 004 > crw-rw-rw- 1 root adm 189, 4 Sep 19 12:09 005 > crw-rw-rw- 1 root adm 189, 5 Sep 19 12:09 006 > crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 189, 6 Sep 19 12:09 007 > crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 189, 8 Sep 19 12:09 009 > crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 189, 9 Sep 19 12:09 010 > > I don't understand this, since there is no rules file. How did it > know to assign these permissions and group? Is there another > mechanism by which USB devices get permissions assigned? > > Thanks, > Mark |