1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 <2024> 2025 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 <2024> 2025 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | Re: archive engine scanned vs sampling |
From: | "Kasemir, Kay via Tech-talk" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> |
To: | Geoffrey Savage <savage at fnal.gov>, "tech-talk at aps.anl.gov" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> |
Date: | Wed, 27 Mar 2024 20:13:37 +0000 |
I think there’s a copy/paste error in that example, listing the same channel name twice. As for scan vs. monitor: Both internally “monitor” the channel and receive an update whenever the IOC sends an update, which for analogs depends on the SCAN and ADEL of the record. <period>00:10:00</period><scan/> will write the most recently received value every 10 seconds. <monitor/> will write every received, well, monitor, but because of internal buffering you should provide an estimated change period. So <period>1.0</period><monitor/> means: Please write every received value,
and assume that you won’t get them more frequently than once every second. Longer explanation can be found in in the older manual.pdf on
https://controlssoftware.sns.ornl.gov/chanarch/, section 2.3 Sampling Options. |