Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
> From [email protected] Mon Jun 10 09:42 MST 1996
> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 96 10:38:45 MDT
> From: [email protected] (Rozelle Wright)
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: mv162 only
>
> This happened to me when I was helping someone set up a system
> with 162's which had floating point. I just
> had them use epics for the 167 instead of the 162.
We have some applications which run mv162s using the EPICS/VxWorks mv167
release. Does anyone know any reason why this is a bad idea? Obviously
it works, but are there any functionality differences?
bret
--------------------
Bret Goodrich, Gemini 8 Meter Telescopes Project, Tucson, Arizona, USA
Internet: [email protected] SPAN/HEPNET: noao::goodrich
Phonenet: 1.520.318.8522 Snailnet: PO Box 26732, Tucson, AZ 85726
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: mv162 only Tim Mooney
- Next:
Re: EPICS on Baja. watson
- Index:
1994
1995
<1996>
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: mv162 only Tim Mooney
- Next:
Re: mv162 only Pete Jemian
- Index:
1994
1995
<1996>
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024