| 1994 1995 1996 1997 <1998> 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 <1998> 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
| <== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
|---|
| Subject: | Re: How many CA server tools per host? |
| From: | [email protected] (Ralph Lange) |
| To: | [email protected] (Jeff Hill) |
| Cc: | [email protected] (EPICS Tech-Talk) |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Nov 1998 15:39:30 +0100 (MET) |
> [...] > This is really a nuisance. I should at some point attempt to eliminate > this inconsistency. One possible solution would be to allow port numbers > to be specified with the IP addresses in EPICS_CA_ADDR_LIST. Jeff, I would really like port numbers being allowed as part of the ADDR_LIST specification. I recently started playing with special CA servers (like CA gateways) on different ports to save name space and avoid side effects on the "normal" CA clients. I am definitely missing the possibility to explicitly add one of those "special port" CA servers to the "normal port" ADDR_LIST of a CA client. Ralph