Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
Korhonen Timo wrote:
> It looks like we have a solution. However, what worries me before going
> ahead, is not having heard any comments from JLab (the source for this
> code) so far...
>
> What would you think of adding to the aai/aao records proper conversions
> to engineering units (like in ai/ao)? They are not presently there and
> would be very useful (at least for our applications.)
The person who wrote the aai,aao rrecord support is no longer at JLAB. I will
assume someone else at JLAB has been reading these messages.
I think you and Eric should go ahead with all the changes that have been
discussed. When you have it working and tested just sent me the source and I
will see that it appears in future releases.
Marty Kraimer
- References:
- Re: aao record behaviour Korhonen Timo
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: aao record behaviour Korhonen Timo
- Next:
aao-aai at JLAB for RF George Lahti
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
<2000>
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: aao record behaviour Korhonen Timo
- Next:
EPICS training at Los Alamos week of June 5th Leo Dalesio
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
<2000>
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024