1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 <2000> 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 <2000> 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | Re: Proposed R3.13.3 |
From: | "Leo Dalesio" <[email protected]> |
To: | "Mark Rivers" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> |
Cc: | <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 14 Jun 2000 15:00:44 -0400 |
It seems that we all agree that the one in base needs to go. Perhaps we could include both EPID and CPID. Rename EPID to be PID. It appears to be a correct version of what PID attempted to do. CPID is special in that it includes some model features. If CPID has some of the same problems that were found in PID, it would be worthwhile to fix them. Someone at JLab may want to look at this. Is anyone using the original PID? SUccessfully? That would mind if we changed this? Bob