Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
Would anyone object to the EPICS scaler record changing to use floats
instead of ints for counter and preset values? The change would allow
the record to support 64-bit counters with minimal modification of the
scaler record, and most clients I'm aware of would not even notice the
difference.
There is the issue of precision: a float has 23 bits of precision, so
the smallest possible difference in two scaler values is roughly one
part in 10^7. Since scaler time bases I'm aware of are accurate only
to a few parts in 10^5, it seems that we'd lose nothing essential by
going to floats.
Tim Mooney ([email protected]) (630)252-5417
Beamline Controls & Data Acquisition Group
Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Lab
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Apropos making fields configurable Bob Dalesio
- Next:
Re: Apropos making fields configurable Marty Kraimer
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
<2001>
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
DDoS Attack - EPICS web-site is down Andrew Johnson
- Next:
[Fwd: socket errors] Geoff Savage
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
<2001>
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025