1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 <2004> 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 <2004> 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | number of monitors |
From: | "Galambos, John D." <[email protected]> |
To: | [email protected] |
Date: | Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:15:09 -0500 |
Hi, We have a client application that saves, compares and
restores machine values. As part of the compare feature it maintains channel
access monitors to the desired PVs . As the number of requested PVs increased,
the performance slowed down (somewhere > 2000 PVs it became noticeable). Do
other people have applications that maintain 1000’s of monitors without
slowdown ? This is a Java app, that uses JCA 2.1.5 for channel
access, and displays results in JTables. I’m wondering if the problem is
in the design choice of using monitors, or something else. Thanks, John G John Galambos Accelerator Systems Division |