Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
Hi,
We are presently considering the use of the Easy CA interface for future
needs. A first but very simple test works fine and was quickly performed
but we are quite frightened by the warnings within the Epics Web site :
"In practice though if you have problems getting code to work that uses
EZCA or if you get unexplained failures or crashes, you will get less
help from the EPICS community in debugging the issue than you will if
you use the native CA API. The CA API is not hard to use, and EZCA is
not maintained as aggressively as the underlying CA library."
So before going further, we would like to know your experience and
feeling when considering the use of the E-Z CA interface not only for
small tests but for bigger developments having to be reliable and to be
used for many years. What would you advice us to do : use the simple E-Z
CA package or prefer the more complex (but better maintained ?) Channel
Access library ?
Thanks a lot for any comment
Eric Lécorché
begin:vcard
fn;quoted-printable:Eric L=C3=A9corch=C3=A9
n;quoted-printable:L=C3=A9corch=C3=A9;Eric
org:Ganil;Groupe Informatique Machine
adr:;;BP 55027;Caen;;14076;France
email;internet:[email protected]
title:Responsable GIM / Coordonateur CC Spiral2
tel;work:02 31 45 47 35
tel;fax:02 31 45 47 28
url:http://www.ganil.fr
version:2.1
end:vcard
- Replies:
- Re: Use of Easy CA ? Ralph Lange
- RE: Use of Easy CA ? Mark Rivers
- Re: Use of Easy CA ? Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: EPICS Gateway question Martin L. Smith
- Next:
Re: Use of Easy CA ? Ralph Lange
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
<2008>
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Motor home status Ron Sluiter
- Next:
Re: Use of Easy CA ? Ralph Lange
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
<2008>
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024