1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 <2010> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 <2010> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | Re: Controls & Physics |
From: | Korhonen Timo <[email protected]> |
To: | "Steiner, Mathias" <[email protected]> |
Cc: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:21:57 +0100 |
My question is this: To what extent are the physics parameters part of the controls?To me and my colleagues (most of them, at least) here this has never even been a question but an obvious thing.
Should there be channels like "Separator:BeamMass," for example?
My feeling is that the beam, as it were, should be part of the control system from the beginning, but I don't have much to back this up.
What do you think?