Don't get me started... oops! too late.
Debby Quock
From: "John William Sinclair" <
[email protected]>
To: "Ned Arnold" <
[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 11:20:31 AM
Subject: Re: QT-based tools: Expressions of interest requested
I was thinking: QtGirl. Only a girl could be better than the best boy.
Ned Arnold wrote:
> Does this mean we will soon have an application called Qt BOY ?
> Not sure where the naming is going here ....
>
> Ned
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From: *"Emmanuel Mayssat" <
[email protected]>
> *To: *"Pavel Stoffel" <
[email protected]>
> *Cc: *
[email protected]> *Sent: *Thursday, March 1, 2012 2:22:35 AM
> *Subject: *Re: QT-based tools: Expressions of interest requested
>
> If I were not already convinced to use Qt, I would be by:
>
> 1/ qt designer demo
> 2/ qt designer demo with epics aware widget
> 3/ look at the xml (ui) code generated
> 4/ start from the shell of a application that takes the xml file
> as an arg and display its content and connect to PV and change
> values of PV (ASgui like)
> 5/ open multiple displays and characterize the load on the machine
>
> After seeing the above, I can immediately ditch m/edm
>
> 6/ look at installation procedure
> 7/ look at migration tools (m/edm to Qt)
> 8/ look at code of a simple interface to Qt (without using
> designer in C++ / python)
> 9/ integration with windows, linux, mac osx GUI themes
>
> complete control system environment
>
> 10/ traditional applications (Striptool, adt, feedback app, alarm
> handler...) ported to Qt
> 11/ 3rd party app (video viewers, ..., non epics aware) <-- I
> believe the GigE pyqt app from Pavel is in that category
>
> I believe as a group, today we can do 1 through 9.
> Heck, if we are lucky one single computer guru from Australia can
> do 1 through 9 alone ;-)
>
> --
> E
>
>
>