Re: Status of the Sequencer

[Benjamin Franksen <benjamin.franksen@helmholtz-berlin.de>]

Hi All

I am sending this reply to tech-talk w/o quoting the original messages. 
There are probably others who have asked themselves similar questions and 
anyway the list of receipients has grown a bit large...

First: Sorry for being silent a bit too long w.r.t. sequencer issues.

The latest snapshot contains a fix for one of the two problems that are 
already listed on the Known Problems page, just as is mentioned there.

I would have long since released 2.1.6, were it not for two new problems: a 
small one I found myself, and another more difficult one found by Daniel 
Keating. I have been working on and off to get the fixes into shape and to 
provide proper regression testing for them.

I am just now updating the Known-problems page to include the as yet 
unmentioned problems. The next upload will contain this update, as well as 
fixes for all known problems. Release 2.1.6 will follow shortly, unless I 
receive yet more bug reports.

In order not to hold up 2.1.6 any longer, I will deviate from hard-won 
discipline and not provide regression tests for the problem Daniel found 
(and helped me to solve). Testing this is unfortunately rather difficult 
with my current test setup and is therefore postponed, maybe indefinitely.

Cheers
Ben

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.