1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 <2012> 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 <2012> 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | Using CAJ in production |
From: | "Shankar, Murali" <[email protected]> |
To: | "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:30:24 -0800 |
Just wanting to check if anyone uses CAJ (pure Java CA client) clients in production especially in combination with IOC's that are using the native CA library. I've pinged a few folks offline; however, it was thought that a community wide repoll would probably be beneficial. Known issues that I am already aware of (thanks Michael and Eric) 1) Interoperability issue with the CA Gateway and clients using monitors with DBE_PROPERTY. 2) For CA Access Security, CAJ uses full hostnames (with domain) and libca uses short host names (without domain) 3) The issue with EPICS_CA_MAX_ARRAY_BYTES has already been fixed. Has anyone encountered any issues/differences on the IOC side? Regards, Murali |