Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
Hi, Mark
> Note that the first time the VAL field is written to with the value 3
the actual
> output is 0, not 3.
I'm also aware of this behavior of mbboDirect. The first time I put
a value into VAL, the mbboDirect outputs 0 (Zero).
Every time I write a new device support, I forget it and spent some
time to find the cause. And in the end, I remenber that the cause is
not in my device support but in mbbiDirect as you mentioned.
I also would like to know if the behavior of mbboDirect is a bug or
specification.
J. Odagiri
----- Original Message -----
> Folks,
>
> I am trying to help Vikram understand the operation of the mbboDirect
record, but I am not clear on how it is supposed to work either.
>
> First, the mbboDirect documentation in the Record Reference Manual
says that the VAL field is type ENUM. This definitely seems to be wrong?
>
> https://wiki-ext.aps.anl.gov/epics/index.php/RRM_3-14_Multi-Bit_Binary_Output_Direct
>
> Second, I am unclear about the relationship or priority of the Bn and
VAL fields. The record reference manual says that one can write
directly to the VAL field, and indeed this does work. But it seems to
have a problem the first time the record is processed. Here is the
output that Vikram observes from caput to the VAL field:
>
> vikram @ control : ~ $ caput SET-MBBO 3
> Old : SET-MBBO 1
> New : SET-MBBO 0
>
>
> vikram @ control : ~ $ caput SET-MBBO 3
> Old : SET-MBBO 0
> New : SET-MBBO 3
>
>
> vikram @ control : ~ $ caput SET-MBBO 1
> Old : SET-MBBO 3
> New : SET-MBBO 1
>
> Note that the first time the VAL field is written to with the value 3
the actual output is 0, not 3.
>
> I believe that is because of the following logic in the mbboDirect
record process() function:
>
> if(prec->nsev < INVALID_ALARM
> && prec->sevr == INVALID_ALARM
> && prec->omsl == menuOmslsupervisory) {
> /* reload value field with B0 - B15 */
> int offset = 1, i;
> unsigned char *bit = &(prec->b0);
> for (i=0; i<NUM_BITS; i++, offset = offset << 1, bit++) {
> if (*bit)
> prec->val |= offset;
> else
> prec->val &= ~offset;
> }
> }
>
> I'm not quite sure what this logic is intended to do. But it seems
that the first time the record processes this block gets executed. So
sevr must be INVALID_ALARM and nsev < INVALID_ALARM, so it sets the VAL
field from the Bn fields, even though the VAL field was directly written
to with the caput(). Is this what is intended?
>
> Note that the Record Reference Manual does not describe this behavior
at all.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on
behalf of Vikram Bhagat [[email protected]]
>
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 9:54 AM
>
> To: [email protected]
>
> Subject:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
> i am using Asyn driver and mbboDirect record type for my
application
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> record (mbboDirect,"SET-MBBO")
>
> {
>
> field(DESC, "New Variable")
>
> field(DTYP, "asynUInt32Digital")
>
> field(OUT, "@asynMask(ni6528_0, 3,7) writembbo")
>
> }
>
>
> Where i have used "writembbo" as reason for device support driver.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> i am not setting any other fields
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I am not even setting B0 to B15 as want the user can set any value
dynamically means user can set any bit 1 or 0 for any bit.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> So first time after IOC restart..... the first value writes 0 (zero)
irrespective of the value I am setting then after it is normal.
>
>
>
>
>
> So why it is only first time then after it is working fine....
whatever value I set it write that value only.
>
>
>
>
> --> if i set field(SEVR, "NO_ALARM")
>
>
> then it works fine at first time after IOC restart.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> So in record process routine
>
> static long process(mbboDirectRecord *prec) in record support
module
>
>
>
> prec->sevr becomes INVALID_ALARM and val field will fill with B0...
B15 and first time value become zero as i am not setting any value for
B0..B15
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Due to this record support module write zero in driver and i am not
able to set first time user define value at runtime.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> How i can come out of this
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> with regards
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
- References:
- [no subject] Vikram Bhagat
- mbboDirect record questions Mark Rivers
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Area Detector Zenon Szalata
- Next:
RE: Area Detector Mark Rivers
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
mbboDirect record questions Mark Rivers
- Next:
Re: mbboDirect record questions Vikram Bhagat
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024