1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 <2013> 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 <2013> 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | RE: ai records: pool (SCAN) VS pull (FLNK) VS push (some examples) |
From: | Emmanuel Mayssat <[email protected]> |
To: | "Johnson, Andrew N." <[email protected]>, Mark Rivers <[email protected]> |
Cc: | EPICS mailing list <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:11:52 -0800 |
> Your AllInterlocks record has SCAN set to "I/O Intr" so forward-linking > to it with a database link will not cause it to process. If you want it > to process on both I/O Interrupt and from the forward link, you will > have to make the forward-link a CA link, so Mark's suggestion above was > almost right. Try this instead: In the meantime, I am trying to wrap my head around a I/O Intr record whose processing is also triggered by a FLNK. Although it can be programmed, in practical terms it doesn't make sense to me. -- E |