1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 <2017> 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 <2017> 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | Re: Question : What kind of OPI is best? |
From: | D Peter Siddons <[email protected]> |
To: | [email protected] |
Date: | Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:18:56 -0500 |
You shouldn't forget epicsQt, which I find almost as easy as MEDM. Pete.
On 02/02/2017 10:21 PM, Mark Rivers
wrote:
Hi Pilkyu Jung, Bad point: medm is old, is based on obsolete software (motif), and is no longer being actively maintained Good point: medm is very simple to get running and has translators for adl files to all other display managers. Bad point: CSS is complex, rather difficult to install. Good point: CSS is being actively maintained, has many more features than medm So based on the good and bad points one decides which is best. We may switch to caQtDM which is actively maintained, but much less complex than CSS. Mark ________________________________ From: PilkyuJung [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 6:36 PM To: Mark Rivers Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Question : What kind of OPI is best? Hi Mark, First of all, your favor was best for solving my problem while I work with EPICS. I appreciate you. And this time, I am sending you e-mail because of a question. These days, I am using CS-Studio as OPI. Also, I have used MEDM. There are some different between CSS and MEDM. But people still using MEDM or EDM. This is my question. Is there something benefit for using MEDM or EDM rather than using CSS(BOY)? Best Regards, Pilkyu Jung -- D. Peter Siddons Detector Development Group Leader Photon Science Division, NSLS-II, Bldg. 535B Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973 email: [email protected] Phone: (631) 344-2738 |