1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 <2018> 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 <2018> 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | medm color map question |
From: | Mark Rivers <[email protected]> |
To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:26:03 +0000 |
Folks, Most medm adl files I have seen have color map definitions that look like this: "color map" { ncolors=65 colors { ffffff, ececec, dadada, c8c8c8, bbbbbb, aeaeae, 9e9e9e, 919191, 858585, 787878, 696969, 5a5a5a, 464646, 2d2d2d, 000000, 00d800, 1ebb00, … However, some have color maps that look like this: "color map" { ncolors=65 dl_color { r=255 g=255 b=255 inten=255 } dl_color { r=236 g=236 b=236 inten=0 } dl_color { r=218 g=218 b=218 inten=0 } dl_color { r=200 g=200 b=200 inten=0 } dl_color { r=187 g=187 b=187 inten=0 } dl_color { r=174 g=174 b=174 inten=0 } The adl2edl program does not handle color maps in the second format. Can anyone tell me what causes medm to use one format vs the other, and is there a way to convert color maps in the second format to be in the first format? Thanks, Mark |