| 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 <2018> 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 <2018> 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
| <== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
|---|
| Subject: | Re: Question about this mailing list |
| From: | "Johnson, Andrew N. via Tech-talk" <[email protected]> |
| To: | "Rivers, Mark L." <[email protected]>, "'J. Lewis Muir'" <[email protected]> |
| Cc: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:31:38 +0000 |
On 11/29/18 11:21 AM, Mark Rivers via Tech-talk wrote: > > Important fields in this message: > To: Michael Westfall <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected] Talk" <[email protected]> > From: William Kirstaedter via Tech-talk <[email protected]> > Reply-To: William Kirstaedter <[email protected]> > Sender: <[email protected]> > > When I do Reply All to this message it goes to William and Michael, > but not to tech-talk. So Outlook appears to be ignoring the CC: header for a Reply All in this case at leasts. - Andrew -- Arguing for surveillance because you have nothing to hide is no different than making the claim, "I don't care about freedom of speech because I have nothing to say." -- Edward Snowdon