1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 <2020> 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 <2020> 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | Re: [EXTERNAL] Tips for doing conditional logic in EPICS records |
From: | "Kasemir, Kay via Tech-talk" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> |
To: | "tech-talk at aps.anl.gov" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>, John Priller <priller at nscl.msu.edu>, "mark_a_davis at comcast.net" <mark_a_davis at comcast.net>, Mark Davis <davism50 at msu.edu> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:52:00 +0000 |
Hi:
Not sure how to pick the "best" solution, but here are your options..
For a basic VAL = condition ? A : B type decision you can use the calc record.
Processed every time, computing a new value every time.
Anybody can see the CALC, so easy to inspect and maintain.
But length of CALC is limited, and if you need to split a larger expressions over multiple CALC records, it's soon getting hard to understand.
In a subroutine record (aSub) you can implement "larger" computations, but then nobody can see/change them without looking at the
source code, recompiling it, i.e. a bit harder to maintain.
If you want to conditionally process records, the calcout record can do that via OOPT settings.
Same advantages and limitations as basic calc record.
If you want to conditionally compute and process things, the SNL sequencer can do that, but as with the subroutine record you now have snl/C code, i.e. separate source code, not easily inspected like records and their fields at runtime.
Thanks,
Kay
From: Tech-talk <tech-talk-bounces at aps.anl.gov> on behalf of Mark Davis via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 11:05 AM To: tech-talk at aps.anl.gov <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>; John Priller <priller at nscl.msu.edu> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Tips for doing conditional logic in EPICS records Hi all,
I am looking for some tips on the best way to implement logic such as the following using EPICS records: flag = 1; for (each new set of readings) { if (readbackA == fixedVal1) flag = 1; else if (flag == 1) setVal = readbackB; else if (readBackC == fixedVal2) setVal = readbackD; flag = 0; } For the initial setting I figured simply a record that includes the initial value in the VAL field (and PINI set to "Yes"?). The for "loop" would be simply an FLNK in the record (or last in a sequence of records) that gets the new readings, triggering the processing of the the record that handles the 1st if condition (in this case, I have one record that gets them all at once). At that point how to best to proceed is not obvious to me, and there are probably lots of possibilities (A sequence of calcout or scalcout records? Maybe a transform record?) Suggestions? -- Mark Davis NSCL/FRIB Control Systems Software Engineer davism50 at msu.edu |