1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 <2025> | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 <2025> |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | Re: [Ext]How to use Optics Slit records with absolute encoders? |
From: | Jesse Hopkins via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> |
To: | "tech-talk at aps.anl.gov" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> |
Date: | Thu, 15 May 2025 15:12:09 +0000 |
Hi Mark, Thanks for the suggestion, the offset parameter is quite useful here (even in just getting the scales to agree, since the vendor seems to have applied them a bit inconsistently). A few months
ago I did set up some slit pseudomotors with the CSAxes in the GALIL, and it worked. What I ran into however is that the ease of use wasn’t great, as setting slit size and position values required manually setting component motor positions (in this case I’d
have to do it via the offsets). Since I’m not doing fly scans or similar with the slits, precise synchronization isn’t as important for me, and the Optics module Slit records provided a high convenience level. I guess the follow on based on what you said is whether there’s a way to get the motor record with absolute encoders to change the offset value when the position is set, so that standard approaches
would work in a transparent fashion? All the best. ---- Sector 18, Advanced Photon Source Research Associate Professor, Illinois Tech |