Hi Mark,
Thanks, that’s exactly what I needed!
All the best.
- Jesse
----
Jesse Hopkins, PhD (he/him)
Director, BioCAT
Sector 18, Advanced Photon Source
Research Associate Professor, Illinois Tech
From:
Mark Rivers <rivers at cars.uchicago.edu>
Date: Thursday, May 15, 2025 at 10:21 AM
To: Jesse Hopkins <jhopkins1 at iit.edu>
Cc: tech-talk at aps.anl.gov <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Ext]How to use Optics Slit records with absolute encoders?
Jesse,
The motor record does change the OFF field and not DVAL as long as you set the FOF field to Variable.
On May 15, 2025, at 10:12 AM, Jesse Hopkins via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the suggestion, the offset parameter is quite useful here (even in just getting the scales to agree, since the vendor seems to have applied them a bit inconsistently). A few months
ago I did set up some slit pseudomotors with the CSAxes in the GALIL, and it worked. What I ran into however is that the ease of use wasn’t great, as setting slit size and position values required manually setting component motor positions (in this case I’d
have to do it via the offsets). Since I’m not doing fly scans or similar with the slits, precise synchronization isn’t as important for me, and the Optics module Slit records provided a high convenience level.
I guess the follow on based on what you said is whether there’s a way to get the motor record with absolute encoders to change the offset value when the position is set, so that standard approaches
would work in a transparent fashion?
All the best.
- Jesse
----
Jesse Hopkins, PhD (he/him)
Director, BioCAT
Sector 18, Advanced Photon Source
Research Associate Professor, Illinois Tech
From:
Tech-talk <tech-talk-bounces at aps.anl.gov> on behalf of Mark via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Date: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 at 9:46 PM
To: tech-talk at aps.anl.gov <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Subject: [Ext]How to use Optics Slit records with absolute encoders?
|