Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
On Monday 30 January 2006 10:05, Luedeke Andreas wrote:
> Benjamin Franksen wrote:
> >On Saturday 28 January 2006 00:52, Chestnut, Ronald P. wrote:
> >>If you do change the seq record (or make a new one), can you please
> >>change the behaviour for a "0" delay? Now a new thread is started
> >> for each (DOL/LNK) pair. If the delay is zero, can you "just do
> >> it" in the same thread? We found that for some big "explosions"
> >> (nested SEQs) the task switching dominates the processing time.
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >However, it /does/ request a callback for each group, regardless
> > whether the delay is zero or not, and this can indeed cause
> > unnecessary context switches. So, yes, I will change this. Adjacent
> > link groups with zero delay will be processed in a synchronous
> > manner i.e. w/o requesting a callback.
> >
> >Thanks for the hint.
>
> If I remember correctly the "seq" record is 100% asynchronous.
True.
> If you specify delays of "0", all DOLn links are supposed to be read
> at the same time.
This would be impossible. It is also not true. Current seq record reads
each inp link (and writes corresponding out link) in a separate
callback.
> How do you want to do this without a callback?
> (You need it to place the value into DOn when it's received and then
> write it to LNKn.)
What's wrong with doing getLink-putLink cycle for multiple link groups
in a loop (as long as their delays are all zero)?
> But of course it would be sometimes useful to have a synchronous
> process chain,
> where the next link is processed after the the previous one completed
> and then the delay elapsed.
This is exactly how the current seq record works. Except that the out
link is fired w/o waiting for it's completion. The sseq can do that.
Ben
- References:
- Re: enhanced seq record Benjamin Franksen
- Re: enhanced seq record Luedeke Andreas
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: enhanced seq record Luedeke Andreas
- Next:
Patches for ARM Linux target Denison, PN (Peter)
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
<2006>
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: enhanced seq record Luedeke Andreas
- Next:
RE: enhanced seq record Mark Rivers
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
<2006>
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024