2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 <2009> 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 <2009> 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | RE: Do we have any plan to support non-fixed size array? |
From: | "Jeff Hill" <[email protected]> |
To: | <[email protected]>, "'Andrew Johnson'" <[email protected]> |
Cc: | [email protected] |
Date: | Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:23:14 -0700 |
Alex, Ø So we can achieve array allocation on demand. Ø This is just my suggestion :) While it’s true that there are weaknesses with the current approach
to memory management used by CA (I am working on that), my current thoughts are
that imposing a (max array size) quota on the client isn’t actually a bad idea –
we can protect IOCs running in resource limited situations. Admittedly, it
would be much better if the magnitude of this quota could be client specific – perhaps
supplied by the access control system. Jeff From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of [email protected]
|