2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 <2010> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 <2010> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | Re: epicsEvent |
From: | Ralph Lange <[email protected]> |
To: | [email protected] |
Date: | Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:57:00 -0400 |
On 28.10.2010 18:59, Ben Franksen wrote:
[...] Regarding the choice of which task will get the semahore if more than one is waiting, I will for now assume that this is (intentionally) left unspecified. This means I will have to implement FIFO order on top of epicsEvent. The only other solution would be to extend the interface with another constructor and then implement FIFO order *inside* epicsEvent for those systems that do not support that natively (which is what you wrote above, so maybe you *did* get the point I was trying to make and I didn't get yours. Whatever ;-).
My current idea is to wait for your FIFO implementation and then see if that can be moved into epicsEvent... ;-)
Ralph