1994 1995 <1996> 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 1994 1995 <1996> 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | Re: Should ai, ao records have RAWH, RAWL? |
From: | [email protected] (William Lupton) |
To: | [email protected] |
Date: | Wed, 9 Oct 1996 08:25:53 -1000 |
Marty said: > Last week during a visit at DESY, Gabor Csuka > suggested that the ai and ao records should have two additional > fields RAWH and RAWL... Is there any mileage in defining some conventions on use of the PARM field (would have to be bus-specific I suspect) to accomplish such things? Such information could be thought of as a sort of DTYP sub-addressing, so what now requires a different DTYP could in the future require the same DTYP but a different PARM. W.