Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
Hello all,
A humble opinion/word: in the literature, for the 'standard' form (cf 'parallel') it is 'ok' as is in the EPID. Note, however, the caution in the in-line comment of the code that Ki is actually 1/Ki w.r.t (same) literature.
The tuning of the parameters, as given in the example of the epid record manual, works well with tools such as mathworks 'pidtune', when all the above are taken into account.
Hope this helps a bit.
Sincerely,
Trivan
PSI
GFA/Controls
________________________________
Von: [email protected] im Auftrag von Mark Rivers
Gesendet: Mi 2/27/2013 2:33
An: Bruce Hill
Cc: [email protected]
Betreff: RE: Question about epid record
Hi Bruce,
As I recall I copied that logic from the old PID record from EPICS base. I agree that KP should probably not be in the I and D terms, but I think it's too late to change it, since users have tuned their EPID systems using this formula.
Mark
________________________________
From: Bruce Hill [[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:36 AM
To: Mark Rivers
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Question about epid record
Hi Mark,
I'm in the process of replacing a genSub based PID controller with
the epid record that you and Bob developed, and I'm puzzled by a difference
in how the two compute the I and D terms.
In the classical PID algorithm, the value of M(n), the manipulated variable is
M(n) = KP*(E(n) + KI*SUMi(E(i)*dT(i)) + KD*(E(n) -E(n-1))/dT(n)
In fact, the above is from line 33 of devEpidSoft.c, and agrees with
other descriptions I've found of the PID calculation.
However, in the do_pid() function, and in epidRecord.html, the
calculation includes the KP gain in the integral and derivative terms.
M(n) = KP*(E(n) + KP*KI*SUMi(E(i)*dT(i)) + KP*KD*(E(n) -E(n-1))/dT(n)
I can scale my KI and KD gain factors by KP to get the equivalent result,
but I don't see why the effective integral gain should be affected when
the proportional gain is tweaked. Ditto for KD.
Any comments or clarification would be appreciated.
Thanks,
- Bruce
--
Bruce Hill
Member Technical Staff
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
- References:
- Question about epid record Bruce Hill
- RE: Question about epid record Mark Rivers
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: Question about epid record Mark Rivers
- Next:
RE: Question about epid record Mark Rivers
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: Question about epid record Mark Rivers
- Next:
RE: Question about epid record Mark Rivers
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024