EPICS Home

Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System


 
1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <20002001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  2025  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <20002001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  2025 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: CA and arrays
From: Marty Kraimer <[email protected]>
To: Brian McAllister <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 14:31:59 -0500
Brian McAllister wrote:
> 
> Marty Kraimer wrote:
> 
> > What causes the confusion is that old database access, which is what CA uses,
> > only knows how to handle the maximum number of elements.
> >
> > The correct behavior is that  cvt_dbaddr sets no_elements = NELM, ie the size of
> > the allocated array and get_array_info returns NORD, i.e. the current actual
> > number of elements.
> 
> Does this explain why the value I sent no_elements to in get_array_info has
> no effect on the number of elements actually returned to a CA client ?


Yes. This will not be fixed until old database access goes away.

Marty


References:
CA and arrays Brian McAllister

Navigate by Date:
Prev: CA and arrays Brian McAllister
Next: Re: Tcl/Tk and JAVA Channel Access Extention Lifang Zheng
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <20002001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  2025 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: CA and arrays Brian McAllister
Next: Build static libraries on WinNT Vladimir Sirotenko
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <20002001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  2025