Re: subRecord fix

[Andrew Johnson <anj@aps.anl.gov>]

Till Straumann wrote:
> I don't know if this has been fixed already...

If you look at the top of the init_record() routine, you'll see that it 
only gets that far down the routine when pass==1, so there would be no 
point passing pass anyway.

The second argument to the init subroutine has been the address of the 
record's process routine since CVS records began (R3.12.2).  Why did you 
think it should be the pass (is there some documentation somewhere that 
implies this?  I have a vague feeling I've seen something, but it's not 
the record reference manual which doesn't even list a second argument to 
the initialzation subroutine).

- Andrew
--
Edsger W. Dijkstra, 1930-2002: "The use of COBOL cripples the mind;
its teaching should, therefore, be regarded as a criminal offence."