Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
Just a strange question, but I've noticed a tendency of all the source files to not have any comments (or very few) in them regarding what they do.
Is this a standard I've just never known about?
Typically, source(s) that I compose end up having as much in comments (or more) than in code, for the simple reason that I can't concentrate on one component at a time, and I might work some now, and some two or three days from now (and I've slept between then and now).
I get so busy with the multiple things I have to do, that if I don't comment the hell out of what I write, I might have to spend quite a bit of time decoding what I was doing before I needed to switch.
Is this the normal style for EPICS, or would there be any objections to comments being added to some of the files as I work with/on them?
David Dudley
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
X-GWTYPE:USER
FN:David Dudley
TEL;WORK:880-3740
ORG:;MIS
TEL;PREF;FAX:880-3741
EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:[email protected]
N:Dudley;David
END:VCARD
- Replies:
- Re: EPICS source Documentation Kay-Uwe Kasemir
- RE: EPICS source Documentation - Bloviation inside - don't open unless you want to waste the time Dalesio, Leo `Bob`
- Re: EPICS source Documentation Andrew Johnson
- Re: EPICS source Documentation Paul Joireman
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Build failure under QNX 6.1 David Eisert
- Next:
Re: Build failure under QNX 6.1 David Dudley
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
<2006>
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Looking for an IOC for Wiener PL512 Bertrand H.J. Biritz
- Next:
Re: EPICS source Documentation Kay-Uwe Kasemir
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
<2006>
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024