1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 <2008> 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 <2008> 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | Re: Use of Easy CA ? |
From: | Noboru Yamamoto <[email protected]> |
To: | epics Techtalk <[email protected]> |
Cc: | Tatsuro NAKAMURA <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:29:57 +0900 |
FWIW -- the MCA package for Matlab and Octave does not use EZCA.Python-CA interface does not use EZCA neither.
On Aug 13, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Mark Rivers wrote:
I certainly hope that EZCA is not abandoned, because there is a LOT of code in interpreted languages such as IDL, Visual Basic (and Matlab?) that depends on it. Those programs will certainly need some interface layer between native CA and the scripting language, since they don't directly support callbacks but do need to use CA monitors. Programs in those languages do not use the "chid" but rather the PV names, and depend on the hash table and caching of chids that EZCA handles.
Regards, Noboru KEK, JAPAN