1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 <2010> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 <2010> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | RE: Controls & Physics |
From: | "Dalesio, Leo" <[email protected]> |
To: | "Steiner, Mathias" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:47:55 -0400 |
>My question is this: To what extent are the physics parameters part of the controls?
>Should there be channels like "Separator:BeamMass," for example?
My feeling is yes! The data has to be calculated and delivered according to some requirement. If the control group does not act as the system integrator and capture the requirement and convey it to the diagnostics and control architecture - it will be left out. So emphatically yes.