| 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 <2010> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 <2010> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
| <== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
|---|
| Subject: | FW: Making a case for cases |
| From: | "Steiner, Mathias" <[email protected]> |
| To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Aug 2010 14:06:26 -0400 |
|
I gots to learn to use "reply all" for these things.
-m From: Steiner, Mathias >>There was one bad part of the SNS naming. As I recall,
the device instance was ambiguous as the cell number and the device instance
were collapsed into 3 digits. So cell 3 pump 12 was the same as cell 31 pump 2.
I don't know if you inherit this - or if you put the device instance separate. Yeah, a highly placed source inside SNS, speaking on condition
of anonymity, had told us about that. Our "instance" is either "instance" or
"position along beamline in cm," depending on where in the system we
are. It's a little clunky, but I think it'll serve us well. In either case, it's separated by "_" from the device
name: cell31pump_002. Cheers -Mathias |