1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 <2010> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 <2010> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | RE: Making a case for cases |
From: | "Chestnut, Ronald P." <[email protected]> |
To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 5 Aug 2010 15:52:19 -0700 |
Just so that this discussion does not stay so dry – ITER has a
naming convention to be avoided at all costs … The only people doing “real” work up to now are the accountants
and mechanical designers, so the core of the naming convention is the Work
Breakdown Structure number of the component. Ron Chestnut From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Alan Biocca One thing that is worth
considering for new projects is to make a program that builds names. A web
based application might be best. So whatever is decided is codified into this
one name ratifier. On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Andrew Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: On Thursday 05 August 2010
14:10:52 Purcell, J. David wrote: Note that since R3.14.11 the IOC supports record aliases,
which may provide a
|