Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
Hi Evgeniy,
On 12/18/2013 01:07 PM, Evgeniy wrote:
> Processing of an EPICS record takes ~2 milliseconds on my SL5.3/DELL
> 2.27 GHz. It is unbelievably slow!
How are you measuring that? There is a problem with your measurement
methodology, as Mark Rivers has shown. How long it actually takes to
process a record is *not* the same as how often you can trigger it to
process, since the latter depends on what method you are using to
trigger its processing. Trying to create a very fast periodic thread is
never going to be an efficient way to make a record process very quickly.
You are likely to get more help from us here on tech-talk if you can
step back and explain what you are trying to achieve, i.e. give us the
big picture problem, not your current specific detail problem, because I
think you may be heading in the wrong direction.
- Andrew
--
Advertising may be described as the science of arresting the human
intelligence long enough to get money from it. -- Stephen Leacock
- References:
- Increasing scan rate to 10 kHz Evgeniy
- Re: Increasing scan rate to 10 kHz Andrew Johnson
- Re: Increasing scan rate to 10 kHz Evgeniy
- Re: Increasing scan rate to 10 kHz Eric Norum
- Re: Increasing scan rate to 10 kHz Evgeniy
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: Increasing scan rate to 10 kHz Mark Rivers
- Next:
RE: Design strategies for CSS BOY screens John Dobbins
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Increasing scan rate to 10 kHz Evgeniy
- Next:
Re: Increasing scan rate to 10 kHz Benjamin Franksen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024