1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 <2014> 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 <2014> 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | RE: Newport XPS-Q8 and Motor Record - armv5teb architecture |
From: | Tonia Batten <[email protected]> |
To: | Stephen Beckwith <[email protected]>, "J. Lewis Muir" <[email protected]> |
Cc: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 6 May 2014 08:41:25 -0600 |
Hi Stephen, The Moxa DA-662 hardware is Big Endian (armv5teb). We are using a gnu compiler. When I do a uname –a on the hardware I get the following information. root@IOC1608-901:~# uname -a Linux IOC1608-901 2.6.10_dev-ixdp42x-arm_xscale_be #1001 Fri Jul 9 20:31:18 CST 2010 armv5teb GNU/Linux The Intel machine we are currently running on is 64 bit. Yes, the ARM compiler being used has the proper library support for double. We have a large number of asyn/stream applications running on this architecture. What do you mean by ….”What happens if you move the double and int? “ Do you mean casting or copying the value? I am wondering about setting up a simple c program just to verify that the value is correct when casting to different types. Regards, Tonia From: Stephen Beckwith [mailto:[email protected]] Intel is Little Endian - ARM can be either - how is the ARMv5 setup? Big Endian or Little Endian? What OS are you dealing with? What compiler? What happens if you move the double and int? Could be padding issue in how the compilers for different ISA handle the alignment. Is the Intel a 64bit CPU? (I know ARMv5 is not, that’s a “StrongArm” variant basically or Marvell. . . Does the ARM compiler being used has proper library support for double? Stephen Beckwith On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 8:39 PM, J. Lewis Muir <[email protected]> wrote: On 5/3/14, 5:32 PM, Mark Rivers wrote: Hi, Mark. |