1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 <2016> 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 <2016> 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | Re: question about archive |
From: | Ralph Lange <[email protected]> |
To: | EPICS Tech-Talk <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 4 Mar 2016 12:48:59 +0100 |
Small comment: I would suggest to *never* put the IOC name into a record name. Which IOC a specific PV is served from is an implementation detail that is irrelevant to the user/client and should not be exposed. Consider that you have to move the record to a different IOC, e.g. because you split up an IOC after it hits some resource limits. Will you be renaming all PVs as you move them? Will you keep the names that are now misleading? This is a recipe for trouble. BTW: The same applies to putting the record type (ai, bi, ...) into the record name. If you ever want to change the implementation (e.g. use a mbbi instead of a bi because you define additional states), your names will be wrong or have to be changed. Just my 2cts... ~Ralph On 04/03/2016 11:21, Mazanec Tomáš
wrote:
|