Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
/usr/bin/gcc -c -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L -D_POSIX_THREADS
-D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_X86_64_ -DUNIX -D_BSD_SOURCE
-Dlinux -D_REENTRANT -O3 -g -Wall -DSCIPLOT -DMOTIF -DEDITRES
-m64 -MMD -I. -I../O.Common -I. -I..
-I../../../../include/os/Linux -I../../../../include
-I../../../../../base/include/os/Linux -I../../../../../base/include
-I../../printUtils -I../../xc -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/X11
../xgif.c
make[2]: *** No rule to make target
`/usr/lib/x86_64-redhat-linux5E/include/gnu/libXt.a', needed by
`medm'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/opt/epics2/extensions/src/medm3_1_9/medm/O.linux-x86_64'
make[1]: *** [install.linux-x86_64] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/epics2/extensions/src/medm3_1_9/medm'
make: *** [medm.install] Error 2
2016-08-18 16:40 GMT-03:00 Mark Rivers <[email protected]>:
> I suspect he received an error message saying that the system could not find libXt.a, which really means it could not find libXt.so or libXt.a?
>
> Mark
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andrew Johnson
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 2:39 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re:
>
> On 08/18/2016 02:21 PM, Henrique Almeida wrote:
>> libXt-devel does not provide libXt.a. Here follows the package list on
>> Red Hat 6.6 and Scientific Linux 6.4.
>
> <snip>
>
>> 2016-08-18 16:13 GMT-03:00 Michael Westfall <[email protected]>:
>>
>> Since it's a derivative of Red Hat, "sudo yum install libXt-devel"
>> should work.
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Henrique Almeida
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello, libXt.a is not available on scientific linux.
>>
>> 2016-08-17 8:54 GMT-03:00 Paramveer Jain
>> <[email protected]>:
>> > where can I get the libXt.a for scientific linux
>> >
>> > someone please help me
>> >
>> > thank you in advance
>
> Paramveer,
>
> Our build of MEDM here at the APS is linked against the shared library
> version libXt.so, do you really need the static library? If so there is
> probably a way to build it yourself from the associated source rpm, but
> I'm not the right person to ask how to go about doing that.
>
> - Andrew
>
> --
> Arguing for surveillance because you have nothing to hide is no
> different than making the claim, "I don't care about freedom of
> speech because I have nothing to say." -- Edward Snowdon
>
- Replies:
- Re: Andrew Johnson
- References:
- [no subject] Paramveer Jain
- Re: Henrique Almeida
- Re: Michael Westfall
- Re: Henrique Almeida
- Re: Andrew Johnson
- RE: Re: Mark Rivers
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: Re: Mark Rivers
- Next:
Re: Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: Re: Mark Rivers
- Next:
Re: Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024