On 08/18/2016 02:21 PM, Henrique Almeida wrote:
> libXt-devel does not provide libXt.a. Here follows the package list on
> Red Hat 6.6 and Scientific Linux 6.4.
<snip>
> 2016-08-18 16:13 GMT-03:00 Michael Westfall <[email protected]>:
>
> Since it's a derivative of Red Hat, "sudo yum install libXt-devel"
> should work.
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Henrique Almeida
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello, libXt.a is not available on scientific linux.
>
> 2016-08-17 8:54 GMT-03:00 Paramveer Jain
> <[email protected]>:
> > where can I get the libXt.a for scientific linux
> >
> > someone please help me
> >
> > thank you in advance
Paramveer,
Our build of MEDM here at the APS is linked against the shared library
version libXt.so, do you really need the static library? If so there is
probably a way to build it yourself from the associated source rpm, but
I'm not the right person to ask how to go about doing that.
- Andrew
--
Arguing for surveillance because you have nothing to hide is no
different than making the claim, "I don't care about freedom of
speech because I have nothing to say." -- Edward Snowdon
- Replies:
- RE: Re: Mark Rivers
- References:
- [no subject] Paramveer Jain
- Re: Henrique Almeida
- Re: Michael Westfall
- Re: Henrique Almeida
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Henrique Almeida
- Next:
RE: Re: Mark Rivers
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Henrique Almeida
- Next:
RE: Re: Mark Rivers
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|