1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 <2018> 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 <2018> 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | Re: Virtual circuit unresponsive on CA Gateway |
From: | Ralph Lange <[email protected]> |
To: | EPICS Tech Talk <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:12:08 +0200 |
Hello Yong,
Thanks a lot for your reply with the information.
We are using the 3.14.12.4 for the CA gateways.
For the information, we were running virtualized CA gateways and yesterday we have built an additional CA gateway on another physical machine without virtualization for comparison of virtualized and physical CA gateways.
As the result, we observed that the message is often being occurred on a virtualized CA gateway but no such message on the physical machine based CA gateway.
In our case for the moment it seems the message is related with performance of system such as network traffic processing.
Thanks again.
Regards,
Sangwon
From: Hu, Yong <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 12:29 AM
To: 윤상원 <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Virtual circuit unresponsive on CA Gateway
Hi Sangwon,
Take a look at this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/epics-base/+bug/541238
At the end, Andrew said “Probably fixed in later versions of Base ….”, “R3.14.10 released”.
Which version of Base is your CA gateway built against?
Best,
Yong
From: <[email protected]> on behalf of 윤상원 <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 at 3:29 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Virtual circuit unresponsive on CA Gateway
Hello,
We are running several CA gateways for providing access to PVs for clients including OPIs.
I observed the warning message “Virtual circuit unresponsive” on log files of the CA gateways.
For instance,
Aug 28 15:29:19 Warning: Virtual circuit unresponsive 172.17.101.21:5064
Aug 28 15:53:40 Warning: Virtual circuit unresponsive 172.17.101.80:5064
…
In addition, when the message is logged on a log file, connections to PVs of the IOC server related with the message (ex. 172.17.101.21) are disconnected.
At the time, connection to the same PVs which directly connects to the IOC server instead of CA gateway is still continued and client (camonitor) can receive changes from the IOC without disturbance.
For the information, we are running two versions of CA gateways, v2.0.4.0 and v2.1.0.
Could anyone please share any guidance or comments in the case?
Thanks in advance for your guidance or any comments.
Regards,
Sangwon